HELMET
https://arxiv.org/abs/2410.02694
Princeton NLP. 7 task categories — RAG with real retrieval, cited generation, summarisation, re-ranking, classification, many-shot ICL, long-document QA — at lengths up to 128K. Model-based evaluation enables open-ended scoring.
Active · Verified 2026-10-28 · fresh as of 2026-10-28 · 31 cited facts, 1 with a third-party source · Suggest a correction
At a glance
- Type
- Holistic downstream-task long-context eval vendor fix
- Tier
- T3
- Section
- Memory benchmarks & evaluation
- Latest release
- no-release no-release vendor fix
- GitHub
- 214★ +2/mo Jupyter Notebook repo fix
- Pricing
- not applicable — open benchmark; free to use repo fix
- Funding
- not applicable — not commercial fix
- Freshness
- 2026-10-28 fix
- Layer
- agent-infra repo fix
- Licensing
- open-source repo fix
- Developer activity
- OpenRank 2.15 (12-mo avg 2.38) · 4 participants — 2025-08 third-party fix
Memory taxonomy
- storage
- n/a
- retrieval
- n/a
- persistence
- n/a
- update
- read-only
- unit
- n/a
- governance
- n/a
- conflict
- n/a
When to use
Optimised for: not applicable - eval dataset, not a system
Anti-fit: not applicable - eval dataset, not a system
Pros & cons
Pros
Heterogeneous long-context benchmark across many task types.
Cons
Limited scale; recall-only focus misses agent-memory nuance.
Claims & capabilities
Study of 51 LCLMs found NIAH scores poorly predict downstream performance. Endorsed by Hugging Face. ICLR 2025.
Technical surface
- API surface
- not applicable — eval dataset, not a system
- Backend storage
- not applicable — eval dataset, not a system
- Deployment
- not applicable — run locally
- Embedding model
- not applicable — eval dataset, not a system
- Multi-tenancy
- not applicable — eval dataset, not a system
- MCP
- not applicable — benchmark / evaluation harness
- A2A
- not applicable — benchmark / evaluation harness
- OpenTelemetry
- not applicable — benchmark / evaluation harness
Similar systems
Other memory benchmarks & evaluation in the catalog, ranked by inbound references.
- LoCoMo T3
Conversations spanning up to 35 sessions / 300 turns / ~9K tokens, built from LLM-agent personas grounded on temporal event graphs and verified by human annotators. Tests QA (single-hop, multi-hop, temporal, commonsense, adversarial), event-graph summarisation, multimodal dialogue.
- GAIA T3
Benchmark for general AI assistants made of real-world questions that require reasoning, multimodality, web browsing and tool use, with a public leaderboard on Hugging Face. Traction: ~917 likes on the Hugging Face dataset
- LongBench T3
Tsinghua THUDM. 21 datasets across 6 categories (single-doc QA, multi-doc QA, summarisation, few-shot ICL, synthetic, code completion) in English + Chinese. ~6.7K words English / 13.4K chars Chinese average. v2 at ACL 2025 with harder, longer instances.
- LongMemEval T3
5 core memory abilities — info extraction, multi-session reasoning, temporal reasoning, knowledge updates, abstention — via 500 curated questions in synthetic chat histories. Two scales: LongMemEval-S (115K tokens), LongMemEval-M (up to 1.5M).
- RULER T3
NVIDIA. Extends NIAH with multi-needle retrieval, multi-hop entity tracing, aggregation, QA — configurable for arbitrary length / difficulty. Evaluated 17 long-context models on 13 tasks.
- InfiniteBench (∞Bench) T3
Tsinghua / OpenBMB. First benchmark with average input >100K tokens. 12 tasks across English + Chinese: long novel QA, code debugging, math in long context, summarisation, retrieval. Realistic documents (novels, code) rather than synthetic filler.
Sources (30 cited facts, 1 third-party)
Each fact links to the page it came from; the badge says who published it (how to read sources).
- What it is Holistic downstream-task long-context eval vendor
- What it does & what's distinct Princeton NLP. 7 task categories — RAG with real retrieval, cited generation, summarisat… vendor
- Claims / benefits Study of 51 LCLMs found NIAH scores poorly predict downstream performance. Endorsed by H… vendor
- Modalities text (7 categories: RAG summarisation re-ranking classification many-shot ICL long-doc QA) vendor
- Created 2024-10 vendor
- Latest release no-release no-release vendor
- License MIT repo
- GitHub 214★ +2/mo Jupyter Notebook repo
- Mindshare 96 citations (Semantic Scholar); Hugging Face endorsed; Princeton NLP pedigree paper
- Citations 96 cites 48/yr paper
- Pricing not applicable — open benchmark; free to use repo
- Deployment not applicable — run locally repo
- Founders / pedigree Princeton NLP + AI2; Howard Yen Tianyu Gao Minmin Chen et al.; no lead confirmed vendor
- Reproducibility Independently reproduced registry
- Code/weights release Code public + weights closed repo
- Versioning none vendor
- Schema evolution not applicable — fixed evaluation dataset vendor
- Pros Heterogeneous long-context benchmark across many task types. vendor
- Cons Limited scale; recall-only focus misses agent-memory nuance. vendor
- Project & sources arxiv 2410.02694 project page vendor
- commit-trajectory [{"ym":"2024-10","cum":39},{"ym":"2024-11","cum":43},{"ym":"2024-12","cum":46},{"ym":"20… repo
- citation-trajectory [{"year":2025,"cum":1,"infl":0}] paper
- cost-input-usd-per-mtok 0 repo
- cost-output-usd-per-mtok 0 repo
- cost-tier free repo
- cost-pricing-model free-tier repo
- cost-last-verified 2026-06-29 repo
- licensing-bucket open-source repo
- taxonomy-three-layer-rollup agent-infra repo
- developer-activity-opendigger {"activity":6.3,"as_of":"2025-08","openrank_12mo":2.38,"openrank_current":2.15,"particip… third-party