LongMemEval

https://arxiv.org/abs/2410.10813

5 core memory abilities — info extraction, multi-session reasoning, temporal reasoning, knowledge updates, abstention — via 500 curated questions in synthetic chat histories. Two scales: LongMemEval-S (115K tokens), LongMemEval-M (up to 1.5M).

Active · Verified 2026-10-23 · fresh as of 2026-10-23 · 29 cited facts, 1 with a third-party source · Suggest a correction

At a glance

Tier
T3
Created
2024-10 vendor fix
Latest release
no releases fix
License
MIT repo fix
GitHub
740★ Python repo fix
Funding
not applicable — not commercial fix
Freshness
2026-10-23 fix
Layer
agent-infra repo fix
Licensing
open-source repo fix

Memory taxonomy

storage
n/a
retrieval
n/a
persistence
n/a
update
read-only
unit
n/a
governance
n/a
conflict
n/a

When to use

Optimised for: not applicable - eval dataset, not a system

Anti-fit: not applicable - eval dataset, not a system

Pros & cons

Pros

Most-cited memory benchmark — ICLR 2025; 5 core memory abilities across 500 curated questions.

Cons

Synthetic chat histories; commercial-model accuracy drop suggests benchmark may overstate real-world failures.

Claims & capabilities

Commercial models show ~30% accuracy drop vs oracle baselines. Primary agent-memory benchmark in 2025. ICLR 2025.

Technical surface

API surface
not applicable — eval dataset, not a system
Backend storage
not applicable — eval dataset, not a system
Deployment
not applicable — evaluation harness; run locally against model API
Embedding model
not applicable — eval dataset, not a system
Multi-tenancy
not applicable — eval dataset, not a system
MCP
not applicable — benchmark / evaluation harness
A2A
not applicable — benchmark / evaluation harness
OpenTelemetry
not applicable — benchmark / evaluation harness

Similar systems

Other memory benchmarks & evaluation in the catalog, ranked by inbound references.

  • LoCoMo T3

    Conversations spanning up to 35 sessions / 300 turns / ~9K tokens, built from LLM-agent personas grounded on temporal event graphs and verified by human annotators. Tests QA (single-hop, multi-hop, temporal, commonsense, adversarial), event-graph summarisation, multimodal dialogue.

  • GAIA T3

    Benchmark for general AI assistants made of real-world questions that require reasoning, multimodality, web browsing and tool use, with a public leaderboard on Hugging Face. Traction: ~917 likes on the Hugging Face dataset

  • LongBench T3

    Tsinghua THUDM. 21 datasets across 6 categories (single-doc QA, multi-doc QA, summarisation, few-shot ICL, synthetic, code completion) in English + Chinese. ~6.7K words English / 13.4K chars Chinese average. v2 at ACL 2025 with harder, longer instances.

  • RULER T3

    NVIDIA. Extends NIAH with multi-needle retrieval, multi-hop entity tracing, aggregation, QA — configurable for arbitrary length / difficulty. Evaluated 17 long-context models on 13 tasks.

  • InfiniteBench (∞Bench) T3

    Tsinghua / OpenBMB. First benchmark with average input >100K tokens. 12 tasks across English + Chinese: long novel QA, code debugging, math in long context, summarisation, retrieval. Realistic documents (novels, code) rather than synthetic filler.

  • Mind2Web T3

    Dataset and benchmark for generalist web agents with 2,350 language-instruction tasks on 137 real websites across 31 domains.

Sources (28 cited facts, 1 third-party)

Each fact links to the page it came from; the badge says who published it (how to read sources).

Related systems

References (3)

  • LoCoMo cites — S2 isInfluential citation
  • MemoryBank cites — S2 isInfluential citation
  • RAPTOR cites — S2 isInfluential citation

Referenced by (4)

  • EverMemOS cites — S2 isInfluential citation
  • LiCoMemory cites — S2 isInfluential citation
  • MAGMA cites — S2 isInfluential citation
  • MemoryArena cites — S2 isInfluential citation