Evo-Memory

https://arxiv.org/abs/2511.20857

Google streaming benchmark for test-time learning: agents must search, adapt and update memory across task sequences. It implements 10+ memory modules on 10 datasets and introduces the ExpRAG and ReMem baselines. Traction: Google (Ed Chi, Fernando Pereira et al.) authorship

Active · Verified 2026-10-23 · fresh as of 2026-10-23 · 7 cited facts, 0 with a third-party source · 1 recorded change · Suggest a correction

At a glance

Type
Benchmark vendor fix
Tier
T3
Created
searched not found fix
Latest release
searched not found fix
License
unknown vendor fix
GitHub
not applicable — no GitHub repo fix
Pricing
searched not found fix
Funding
searched not found fix
Freshness
2026-10-23 fix
Layer
agent-infra repo fix

Memory taxonomy

storage
none-trivial
retrieval
none
persistence
cross-session
update
read-only
unit
trajectory
governance
n/a
conflict
out-of-scope

When to use

Optimised for: searched not found

Anti-fit: searched not found

Pros & cons

Pros

searched not found

Cons

searched not found

Claims & capabilities

Abstract: Statefulness is essential for large language model (LLM) agents to perform long-term planning and problem-solving. This makes memory a critical component, yet its management and evolution remain largely underexplored. Existing evaluations mostly focus on static conversational settings, where memory is passively retrieved from dialogue to answer queries, overlooking the dynamic ability to accumulate and reuse experience across evolving task streams. In real-world environments such as interactive problem assistants or embodied agents, LLMs are required to handle continuous task streams, yet often fail to learn from accumulated interactions, losing valuable contextual insights, a limitation that calls for test-time evolution, where LLMs retrieve, integrate, and update memory continuously during deployment. To bridge this gap, we introduce Evo-Memory, a comprehensive streaming benchmark and framework for evaluating self-evolving memory in LLM agents. Evo-Memory structures datasets into sequential task streams, requiring LLMs to search, adapt, and evolve memory after each interaction. We unify and implement over ten representative memory modules and evaluate them across 10 div

Technical surface

API surface
searched not found
Backend storage
searched not found
Deployment
searched not found
Embedding model
searched not found
Multi-tenancy
searched not found
MCP
searched not found
A2A
searched not found
OpenTelemetry
searched not found

Similar systems

Other memory benchmarks & evaluation in the catalog, ranked by inbound references.

  • LoCoMo T3

    Conversations spanning up to 35 sessions / 300 turns / ~9K tokens, built from LLM-agent personas grounded on temporal event graphs and verified by human annotators. Tests QA (single-hop, multi-hop, temporal, commonsense, adversarial), event-graph summarisation, multimodal dialogue.

  • GAIA T3

    Benchmark for general AI assistants made of real-world questions that require reasoning, multimodality, web browsing and tool use, with a public leaderboard on Hugging Face. Traction: ~917 likes on the Hugging Face dataset

  • LongBench T3

    Tsinghua THUDM. 21 datasets across 6 categories (single-doc QA, multi-doc QA, summarisation, few-shot ICL, synthetic, code completion) in English + Chinese. ~6.7K words English / 13.4K chars Chinese average. v2 at ACL 2025 with harder, longer instances.

  • LongMemEval T3

    5 core memory abilities — info extraction, multi-session reasoning, temporal reasoning, knowledge updates, abstention — via 500 curated questions in synthetic chat histories. Two scales: LongMemEval-S (115K tokens), LongMemEval-M (up to 1.5M).

  • RULER T3

    NVIDIA. Extends NIAH with multi-needle retrieval, multi-hop entity tracing, aggregation, QA — configurable for arbitrary length / difficulty. Evaluated 17 long-context models on 13 tasks.

  • InfiniteBench (∞Bench) T3

    Tsinghua / OpenBMB. First benchmark with average input >100K tokens. 12 tasks across English + Chinese: long novel QA, code debugging, math in long context, summarisation, retrieval. Realistic documents (novels, code) rather than synthetic filler.

Sources (6 cited facts, 0 third-party)

Each fact links to the page it came from; the badge says who published it (how to read sources).

What changed

Changes to this record's lifecycle, licence, release, pricing and hosting facts, from the catalog's git history. Subscribe (Atom)

  1. 2026-10-23 Added to the catalog #222