Catalog Systems Theoretical / informal — ideas without a paper From Human Memory to AI Memory (survey)

From Human Memory to AI Memory (survey)

Eight-quadrant classification grid across personal/system, parametric/non-parametric, and short-term/long-term axes. Bridges cognitive-science memory taxonomy to LLM architecture choices, less common than purely engineering-oriented surveys. v2 revision April 23, 2025.

At a glance

Type: 3D taxonomy: object × form × time
Tier: T4
Section: Theoretical / informal — ideas without a paper
Created: 2025-04
Latest release: not applicable — not OSS
License: not applicable — not OSS
GitHub: not applicable — no GitHub repo
Pricing: not applicable — not commercial
Funding: not applicable — not commercial

Taxonomy

storage: n/a
retrieval: n/a
persistence: n/a
update: n/a
unit: n/a
governance: n/a
conflict: n/a

When to use

Optimised for: not applicable - theoretical / not a system

Anti-fit: not applicable - theoretical / not a system

Pros & cons

Pros

3D taxonomy provides orthogonal categorization axes that cut across existing framework-centric surveys; cognitive-science grounding enables comparison with neuroscience literature.

Cons

Coverage of very recent (2026) methods is limited in v2; survey-only — no new method or empirical evaluation.

Claims & capabilities

26-page survey covering encoding, storage, retrieval; maps open problems and future directions.

Technical surface

API surface: not applicable — research paper
Backend storage: not applicable — research paper
Deployment: not applicable — not a deployable product
Embedding model: not applicable — research paper
Multi-tenancy: not applicable — research paper
MCP: not applicable — theoretical / informal idea
A2A: not applicable — theoretical / informal idea
OpenTelemetry: not applicable — theoretical / informal idea

Similar systems

Other theoretical / informal — ideas without a paper in the catalog, ranked by inbound references.

Context Engineering T5
"+1 for 'context engineering' over 'prompt engineering' … the delicate art and science of filling the context window with just the right information for the next step." The LLM is "a coworker with anterograde amnesia" — cannot consolidate or build long-running knowledge once training ends.
Context Engineering — naming event T5
Endorses "context engineering" as a distinct discipline from prompt engineering — what agents do with their context window (routing, compression, tool output formatting, memory retrieval injection) is engineering, not just prompting.
Context Expansion Law T5
"Application context tends to expand to fill the context limits supported by the model." Treats agent memory as a first-class unresolved design problem rather than a solved component; explicitly defers a memory deep-dive to a future post.
Externalization in LLM Agents T4
Traces the shift from weights-as-capability to harness-as-capability; analyzes memory, skills, and protocols as three coupled forms of externalization and examines how they interact. Memory is defined as the externalization of state across time. Covers self-evolving harnesses and shared agent infrastructure as emerging directions. April 9, 2026.
Files Are All You Need T5
Coding agents (Claude Code, Cursor) converge on the filesystem as their primary memory abstraction: conversation histories as searchable files, skills as files, retrieval via file search rather than vector DBs. Argument: LLMs are fluent with filesystem concepts, so the filesystem is the right interface even if storage underneath is a database.
Four-Type Agent Memory Taxonomy T5
"Agent = LLM + memory + planning + tools." Maps cognitive memory types to LLM machinery: sensory (learned embeddings), short-term / in-context (the context window), long-term (external vector store with fast retrieval). The first widely-cited taxonomy mapping human memory science onto LLM agent architecture.